Showing posts with label Recorder: Resa Haile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recorder: Resa Haile. Show all posts

2014-07-08

0015: The Noble Bachelor


DATE
September 24,2011 
11:00 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Carol Beilharz, Tamara Bower, Ron Del Ciello, Tom Drucker, Herbert Emmel, Resa Haile, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer.

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

QUIZ AND MISCELLANY
Tom provided the quiz. Gayle took first place, Ron, second, and Tamara, third.

STORY: THE ADVENTURE OF THE NOBLE BACHELOR
Gayle said she felt “The Noble Bachelor” presents one of the most disagreeable clients ever. She also added that it should have been “Lord Robert,” not “Lord St. Simon,” as he had an older brother. Resa suggested Watson might not have realized that. Tamara said St. Simon had an inflated idea of his own importance. She noted that Holmes was having fun with Watson the entire time. He teases Watson twice. Resa asked if Lord St. Simon’s expectation was really out of line? From his point of view, he usually is the hottest thing. Flora Millar was a “kept woman.” She drew a comparison between Irene Adler and the king and Lord St. Simon and Flora. Tamara noted the “jumping the claim” misdirection. Gayle said St. Simon was a jerk. Resa questioned if people would have thought of him as a jerk. He kept a mistress, but he took care of her, and he gave her up when he was about to be married, which he didn’t have to do.

Tamara said it was his case that was of moment to Holmes, not his position. Ron said that the story showed Doyle’s attitude towards class and towards Americans. Resa noted the two countries were close allies. Gayle said that Doyle was very influenced by American writers: James Fenimore Cooper, Edgar Allan Poe, Oliver Wendell Holmes. Doyle’s family had connections to members of Parliament, writers, and artists, yet Doyle grew up poor, because his father drank. His sisters had to go out and work as governesses. Governesses were powerless. Resa mentioned “Thor Bridge.” Gayle said Doyle showed it wasn’t just the poor who commit crimes. Tamara noted that, unlike in the Brett series, they all bow to each other. Gayle said Holmes snubbed the king. Resa felt sorry for St. Simon; he made a fair deal, title for money. The marriage market. Gayle ticked off some examples of these types of marriages.

Ron thought the writing was excellent. One of the best examples of Doyle’s writing. “You really got to know some of the characters.” Yet Doyle rated it low among his stories. Resa asked what everyone thought of Hatty’s actions. Tamara noted that at first, Hatty thought she was seeing a ghost. Ron said she was just a kid, intimidated. Gayle thought she sort of went into shock. Resa said, “But afterwards, they’re just going to leave.” Tamara said to think of her first marriage; it reflects back to that. You marry, you fly. Resa noted that Lord St. Simon needs a wife with a fortune to keep up his property. Tamara said he faced a bleak future. Resa felt there were no villains; everyone deserved sympathy. Gayle thought he would be looking for another wife. Herb mentioned that the Rhodes Scholarship performs a function of bringing cultures together now.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2011-10-16

0009: THE RED-HEADED LEAGUE

DATE
Saturday, March 26, 2011
11 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Vicki Clark, Tom Drucker, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

QUIZ AND MISCELLANY

The quiz was presented by Victor with prizes provided by Tom. Gayle took first place, Resa second, and Tom third. Gayle reported that she recently gave a talk at the Menomonee Falls Public Library on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes. She presented copies of A Practical Handbook of Bee Culture by Laurie R. King (writing as Sherlock Holmes) to the group. Resa read “The Date of The Red-Headed League” by Greg Darak, from The Baker Street Journal, December 1991.

Elaine reported on watching Matt Frewer as Holmes. A Royal Scandal combines “A Scandal in Bohemia” with “The Bruce-Partington Plans” and changes both stories considerably. Elaine was not favorably impressed and noted that they dropped the most important part of “A Scandal in Bohemia”—when Adler greets Holmes on the street. Elaine also thought Sherlock Holmes was portrayed as mean in the Matt Frewer series of movies.

STORY: THE ADVENTURE OF THE RED-HEADED LEAGUE
Gayle noted that Holmes brought the pack of cards to the stakeout. Resa said he was thoughtful of the banker. Tom suggested that maybe he was planning on playing for money. Gayle said he liked whist and maybe always carried a pack of cards with him. Victor said, “I play whist. Simple game. Sometimes frustrating. Simple to learn, hard to master.”

Vicki said she liked how the story changed and progressed and how Conan Doyle brought in so many little things that the reader had to pay attention to—Holmes’ looking at the assistant’s knees had meaning later on. Gayle said that hunting is done in couples. There is an even number of dogs. Tom noted that there was honor among thieves in the story, which differed from Doyle’s representation of the aristocracy.

There was the question of what was done with the dirt from the tunnel. Gayle noted one theory is that it was taken away on a dray in wooden crates. The gold could also be taken away this way, in small bags. Gayle explained the worth of the gold in modern terms. Victor noted it took two to six months to work on the tunnel. Gayle said there was a similar bank robbery in France a year or so ago. The logistics of the robbery were discussed. Victor said it was necessary to dig down fairly deep to avoid a tunnel collapse.

Resa wondered about Holmes and John Clay. Holmes recognized Clay, but Clay didn’t recognize Holmes. When they met before, was Holmes in disguise? As the fourth-smartest man in London, could Clay have been one of the men who had previously beaten Holmes? Gayle said Holmes might not have directly met Clay. Tom questioned the meanings of the pierced ear would have in terms of the upper class or homosexuality. Gayle suggested rebellion.

Resa read two similar quotes and asked for comments. From The Red-Headed League: Jabez Wilson says, “Now, it is a fact, gentlemen, as you may see for yourselves, that my hair is of a very full and rich tint . . .” From The Copper Beeches: Violet Hunter states, “As you may observe, Mr. Holmes, my hair is somewhat luxuriant, and of a rather peculiar tint of chestnut.” Victor said when targeting someone, you pick out something peculiar to that person. Gayle said the hair color was integral to the League. Elaine noted that red hair is not really the color red. Gayle wondered if Jabez Wilson was dying his hair. Possibly he was homosexual and dying his hair to make himself attractive to younger men. The fourteen-year-old girl could have been an unwitting accomplice. Resa said that Wilson’s age is really subjective. It is Watson as a young man who is viewing Wilson as elderly. Some people don’t go grey as early as others. Elaine said it depended on the person. Her mother had black hair  at sixty, but at seventy, it was grey. Gayle thought maybe the events of the League would turn Wilson’s hair grey. In the Annotations, it is suggested that Clay’s “jump and I’ll swing for it” line might mean to swing himself back into the hole and escape, rather than swing as in hang. This bank robbery wasn’t a hanging crime. Resa noted that he had committed a hanging crime before, as he was “murderer, thief, smasher, forger.” Murder was a hanging crime. Perhaps this was when he crossed Holmes’ path before.

The question of why they dissolved the League before the crime was discussed. Resa noted that in another article Greg Darak wrote, it was Clay’s ego; he couldn’t stand listening to Wilson tell him to improve himself any longer. Gayle thought maybe Duncan put up the card without telling Clay. They might not have had enough time together when they were able to speak for Duncan to tell Clay.

Elaine wondered how heavy the gold was. There was some figuring, which led to a possible 1850 to 1875 pounds. Elaine said, “There must have been more members to the gang.” Gayle suggested that Moriarty might have hired out some helpers to Clay. It was not a standing-up tunnel, she noted. She felt Moriarty must have been involved, possibly in planning, providing drays, crates, and diggers, and that he would have received a cut of maybe 15 percent.

Resa had just read The Eye of the Crow by Shane Peacock, which deals with boy Sherlock Holmes’ first case. There is a character in danger of hanging and it seems the hanging will take place very quickly after trial. Of course, that story takes place in the 1860s, but she wondered about the appeal process. Gayle said new evidence would go in front of the same judge who had tried the case, and he was unlikely to reverse himself. Doyle helped establish the British Court of Appeals. Gayle shared a pastiche idea she plans to write.

NEXT MEETING

THE BOSCOMBE VALLEY MYSTERY—April 30, 2011, 11 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2011-10-01

0008: SHERLOCKIAN REPORTS AND SHARING MEMORABILIA

DATE
Saturday, January 22, 2011
11 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Tom Drucker, Resa Haile, Bryan Pike, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

REPORTS AND MISCELLANY

This meeting was a chance for the group to share memorabilia and discuss any thoughts relating to Sherlock Holmes. Gayle reported on the Baker Street Irregulars weekend; her report will be published in the Evansville Review and appears elsewhere on this blog (http://originaltreeworshippersrc.blogspot.com/2011/08/baker-street-irregulars-birthday.html). She also shared the songs from her musical parody My Fair Sherlock. Memorabilia included Professor Moriarty’s Uber Venom and a Sherlock Holmes puzzle (Gayle) and a collection of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine’s annual Sherlock Holmes issue (Resa). The conversation meandered along many interesting byways.

STORY: No Story

NEXT MEETING

The Adventure of the Red-Headed League
Saturday, March 26, 2011

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2011-05-21

0007: THE BLUE CARBUNCLE

THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY
DATE
Saturday, November 20, 2010
11:00 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Tom Drucker, Linda Fredell, Resa Haile, Bryan Pike, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer.

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

REPORTS AND MISCELLANY
Gayle reported on the book Irregular Crises of the Late ’Forties edited by Jon L. Lellenberg (agent for the Conan Doyle estate in the U.S.) and shared the song, We Never Mention Aunt Clara. Sherlockian James Montgomery used to claim that his aunt Clara was Irene Adler.

Resa read “In Defense of Henry Baker’s Hat” by Greg Darak from The Baker Street Journal, Winter 2003.

STORY: THE ADVENTURE OF THE BLUE CARBUNCLE
Tom provided the quiz for this story, with first place going to Gayle, Victor and Linda tied for second, and Resa in third place.

Tom noted that because of the order we read the stories, with “A Case of Identity” and “The Blue Carbuncle” coming so close together, the similarities and contrasts became apparent, with the exits and how Holmes resolves the two stories differently. There is “a clatter on the stairs” in both cases. In both cases the miscreant is set free; in one case to continue to a bad end, but in the other with hope of reform.

Gayle said that if you read the entire Canon as it’s published, you see that Holmes changes. He recognizes people’s foibles more and more and has a more rounded character. Victor: “As I read the stories, I keep a list of the outcome. Holmes is more interested in justice than the letter of the law.” Bryan wasn’t sure he ever showed respect for the law. Victor agreed that “[w]hen Holmes has a choice, he prefers to mete out his own justice.” Tom commented on Gayle’s observation; in the early stories, Holmes was a Dupin character. The Post-Reichenbach stories are more sentimental.

Gayle didn't think Holmes would have forgiven James Windibank in “A Case of Identity.” Mary Sutherland’s emotions tangled up for possibly thirty years; it was unforgivable. In “The Abbey Grange,” Holmes said he would rather play tricks with the laws of England than with his own conscience. She thought he softens towards policemen. Bryan said Holmes didn't necessarily want to follow the law.

Tom noted the ending of “The Illustrious Client”: “. . .when an object is good and a client sufficiently illustrious, even the rigid British law becomes human and elastic. My friend has not yet stood in the dock.”

Regarding the brushing, or lack thereof, of Henry Baker’s hat, Gayle stated that the Victorian housewife had to be house proud: “The shining stair rails in The Sign of Four.” The middle class strove to be quite respectable and it was so easy to slip down the social ladder. Women worked very hard to keep up. Victor asked if anyone walking down the street would notice a dusty hat; it’s different if the hats are next to each other.

There was a discussion of hats and the different types of hats the Victorians would wear for different occasions.

Resa asked if the group thought James Ryder reformed. It was generally agreed that he was scared enough. There was some discussion of Watson’s marriages, including June Thomson’s Grace Dunbar theory. Bryan noted that Watson’s home life is mentioned very little. “He teases people. We kind of find clues. If he were real, his home life would come in . . . but it wouldn't be the focus.”

NEXT MEETING
NO STORY: SHOW AND TELL—January 22, 2011, 11 a.m.
There will be no meeting in February.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2011-03-14

0006: THE SUSSEX VAMPIRE

THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY
DATE
Saturday, October 30, 2010
11:00 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Ron Del Ciello, Tom Drucker, Linda Fredell, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Bryan Pike, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer.

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

REPORTS AND MISCELLANY
Gayle reported on the latest meeting of the Criterion Bar Association of Chicago, for which she is the Solitary Typist. Steven Doyle, the author of Sherlock Holmes for Dummies, attended, and Gayle had the opportunity to talk with him and tell him about our group. She also acquired a copy of the play, Sherlock Holmes’ Last Case by David Stuart Davies, on CD. This is a one-man show in which Holmes, after the death of Watson, remembers his good friend and companion. Roger Llewellyn portrays the Great Detective. Gayle read the poems/songs “The Chase” and “Portraits” from Baker Street Ballads (1979) by Charles E. Lauterbach. In honour of the holiday, Gayle shared some information about The Annotated Dracula by Bram Stoker. The annotations are by Leslie Klinger, who treats the events in Dracula as historic fact.

Tom shared his photos of stained-glass windows portraying literary characters, including Mr. Holmes, from a library in St. Thomas College in Minnesota. (These stained-glass windows can be viewed here: http://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/about/history/stainedglass.html.) Tom also had information about Sherlockian Christmas cards that are available from the Sherlock Holmes Society of London.

Resa noted some recent additions to the Hedberg Public Library which may be of interest to Sherlockians, including DVDs of the Jeremy Brett (complete) and Douglas Wilmer (complete surviving episodes) television series; The Strange Return of Sherlock Holmes, the first book in a new series with Sherlock Holmes in the modern day, by Barry Grant; and (of peripheral interest, as the male lead is a detective who plays the violin and has one or two familiar vices) the latest of the Lady Julia Grey mystery series, Dark Road to Darjeeling by Deanna Raybourn.

Victor noted, as a point of local interest, that Parker Pen used to sponsor the Sherlock Holmes radio show with Basil Rathbone.

STORY: THE ADVENTURE OF THE SUSSEX VAMPIRE
Elaine provided the quiz for this story, with first place going to Ron, second to Gayle, and third to Tom.

Resa noted that this story, being later in the run, gives us an older Holmes and Watson, and that this is an interesting contrast. Gayle said she liked the line “No ghosts need apply.” She felt this expressed the rationalist Holmes, who would not believe in a supernatural agent, but she was also intrigued because of the American phrase “No Irish Need Apply,” used to discriminate against Irish immigrants seeking employment. Tom wondered if Doyle had heard the expression when he was in the United States.

Gayle said the solution was a Doylean twist. “All crime did not arise from the gutters of limehouse.” Bryan said he was talking to a “real-life CSI guy” last summer, who felt that any one among us could commit a crime. Tom noted, “One can also look at Jacky as a nascent homosexual” and one can wonder if this is Doyle’s comment on the nature of homosexual personality. Resa felt that Jacky’s relationship with his father was difficult; he wanted more affection than he got. Gayle thought maybe Jacky had been kept away from his father when Ferguson was traveling. Victor pointed out that there was at this time a separation by the culture of parent and child. They were sent off to school at a young age. Linda said it was traditional to get them connections (the old school tie). Resa noted that Ferguson and Watson were at school together. Gayle also noted Percy Phelps in “The Naval Treaty” “could call on Watson” because they knew each other from school.

She also agreed that “the homosexual aspect that Tom mentioned is quite valid. . . . Conan Doyle came at sex obliquely.” A friend of his, Sir Roger Casement, who was a homosexual, was arrested for treason. Doyle tried to save him from execution but failed. Gayle recently heard a television report that high and low sex drives may be determined by genes, and perhaps Holmes had a low sex drive. “ ‘If I’m not busy, if I’ve finished my chemical experiment, maybe I’ll think about it.” Many people try to put Holmes and Watson together as a couple. “No one seems to be able to grasp the idea that two men can just be friends.”

Bryan said that it was common to share beds at this time. Gayle noted that the first chapter of Moby Dick has a character going to an inn and having to share a bed with a stranger. Linda pointed out this also helped because of the cold. Ron said that he’d toured the Milton House, and that it was common, not to rent a room, but to rent part of a room or a bed. There was some discussion about how things were different culturally in Italy and Germany and that the United States is considered a more puritanical country.

Resa also brought Skewed Sherlock by David L. Hammer and Violet Hunter to the group’s attention. In it, various stories are examined and it is argued that Holmes’ solutions were incorrect. In “The Adventure of the Sussex Vampire,” it is suggested that Mrs. Ferguson framed Jacky. Gayle objected to this, based on the wounding of Mrs. Ferguson’s own infant son. Ron suggested that a mother who was a vampire would have done that, and the story discussion ended in laughter.

SHERLOCK: TELEVISION SERIES
There was a discussion of the new Sherlock television series set in the twenty-first century, which stars Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman and is created by Stephen Moffat and Mark Gatiss.

Gayle felt that Sherlock “did magic with his cell phone.” Resa particularly liked the text messages appearing in the air within the scene rather than the unexciting close-up usually used. Gayle wondered why Lestrade needed Sherlock so much. Ron said Sherlock was not terribly likable. Bryan said Sherlock Holmes is portrayed in films as short with people. Not in the stories, Resa said. Bryan said it was a misinterpretation. Linda said she grew up with the Basil Rathbone films, and that he was that way. Gayle said when she thinks of Holmes, it is Basil Rathbone, but when she thinks of Watson, it is Edward Hardwicke. Her Moriarty is from the Granada series (Eric Porter). She thinks the new series portrays Sherlock’s mental processes well. (“What is it like in your tiny little minds?”)

Victor pointed out that Watson is wounded in Afghanistan in the original stories and also in the new series: “These people have been at war their entire existence.” He said that Afghanistan is “located in the middle of trade routes. Amazing they still exist; they are a warrior people. Their civil wars are as bad as anything else.”

Gayle noted some of the different psychological labels people have applied to Holmes. In the new series, someone calls him a “psychopath”; he describes himself as a “high-functioning sociopath”; some people have posited he has Asperger’s. Gayle thinks it is reasonable that someone thinking of other things would pay no attention to meals or social niceties.

Ron thought that Mycroft was too thin. Victor felt the television show changed Sherlock and Mycroft’s relationship to a more adversarial one. Gayle thought with the seven-year age gap (particularly in the Victorian era) and children being sent off to boarding school, that Sherlock and Mycroft would have been raised as two “only children.” Victor noted that London has more surveillance cameras than anywhere in the world and Mycroft has access to all of them.

Resa wondered if anyone else was disappointed in Sherlock not deducing the killer in “A Study in Pink,” although he had done so in the story, A Study in Scarlet. Gayle said it was the “invisible” killer like in the G.K. Chesterton story. Gayle was impressed with Martin Freeman as John Watson. She liked the scene in the Italian restaurant: “Look, I’m very flattered—” Resa noted that Sherlock seems to have enough money and not need a roommate for that purpose, so—is he lonely? Gayle said that Doctor Who was completely capable of zipping over the universe by himself, but he likes companionship, so it’s the same dynamic. Ron pointed out that “danger is addictive” for both Sherlock and John—John just got back from the war, but he misses it. Ron drew a parallel with the movie The Hurt Locker.

Resa noted that in the previous meeting, the group discussed adaptations differing substantially from the source material. “The Last Vampyre” is loosely based on “The Adventure of the Sussex Vampire” and “A Study in Pink” is loosely based on A Study in Scarlet. She asked if these were nonetheless faithful to the spirit of the characters? Answers focused on “A Study in Pink.”

Gayle said that if you wrote down Holmes’ attributes from the story and Sherlock’s from the television show, they would be pretty close; it was the trappings that were different. Ron said he had been skeptical about doing the characters in the modern era, but that it captured his concept of who Sherlock was and fleshed out a little more about Watson. But he was disappointed, because so much of the stories is the atmosphere of the era. Gayle said it (updating) had been done before with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce.

There was some discussion of Watson and Nigel Bruce. Resa noted that, as commentators have pointed out, Bruce’s Watson is competent when Holmes isn't around. Bruce is also more versatile as an actor than people think. (She gave The Chocolate Soldier as an example and Gayle gave The Rains Came, in which Bruce is a villain.) Bryan said that Watson was stupid from his own perspective, not from an objective perspective. Watson is telling the story against himself.

NEXT MEETING
THE ADVENTURE OF THE BLUE CARBUNCLE—November 20, 2010, 11 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2010-10-06

0005: A CASE OF IDENTITY

THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY
 
DATE
Saturday, September 25, 2010
11:00 a.m.
 
LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room
 
MEMBERS PRESENT
Vicki Clark, Tom Drucker, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Victor Rufer
 
CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile
 
PAPER
Victor presented his original paper, “Sherlock is in the House,” in which he compared and contrasted Sherlock Holmes and Greg House of House, M.D. Although there are many (and deliberate) similarities, Victor pointed out some important differences.
 
STORY: A CASE OF IDENTITY
Resa explained that when she scheduled the meeting, she looked in a copy of The Adventures for the next story to follow “A Scandal in Bohemia.” In this particular copy, it was “A Case of Identity,” but she later noticed that, in most editions, the next story is “The Red-Headed League.” This switching of the stories seems to follow the Oxford editions. Conan Doyle apparently wrote “Identity” to follow “Scandal” and the Strand editors, feeling that “League” was the stronger story, transposed the order. There are references to “Scandal” in “Identity,” and the stories show different sides of Holmes’ dealings with women. Up until this point, Doyle was telling the stories in order, but, at some point, he perhaps realized that it would be easier to have Watson on the spot, and he started to go back to adventures taking place during Watson’s bachelor days. He may have gotten the idea to do this because of the change in order first accomplished by the Strand.
 
The quiz was provided by Ron Del Ciello, who was unable to attend; Resa administered the quiz. Victor took first place, Elaine second, and Tom and Vicki tied for third.
 
DISCUSSION
The quiz ended with the discussion question: Was Holmes right in not telling Mary Sutherland the truth?
 
Vicki thought that Mary Sutherland’s heart might be pining for Hosmer Angel and it’s only fair for her to know that he’s not a real character. Elaine argued that it was Holmes’ professional responsibility to tell her and that this is a reason Holmes does not marry, because he looks down on the intelligence of people who are in love. She said it is true that when people are in love, their I.Q.s tend to go down, but they come back up in a couple of years. Looking down on the intelligence of people in love is one reason Holmes was beaten by Irene Adler. Holmes thinks that Windibank will end up on the gallows, but that will be “too late for Mary Sutherland. [When Windibank goes to the gallows] many people will have suffered.” Holmes doesn’t want to tell the truth because he thinks people in love will do stupid things. Victor said that not telling reinforced Victorian sexism. Windibank was exploiting these two women [mother and daughter]. “He’s Sherlock Holmes; he should be smart enough to come up with something.” Tom pointed out that women in this era were attending college, and many women were not willing to conform to traditional roles. Tom took the minority opinion that Holmes did the right thing because “we wouldn't have known he reads Hafiz and Horace and could compare the two.” He thought it was interesting to compare this to “The Blue Carbuncle,” a case in which Holmes also let the malefactor go. In that case, he believed the culprit could be redeemed. In most other cases, he believed the criminal acted with justification. “A Case of Identity” might be the only instance of Holmes letting someone go without these conditions. Resa thought maybe Holmes had more in store for Windibank than he was letting on, and also, that Holmes said if he told her, she would not believe him, but he didn’t actually say he wouldn’t tell her.
 
Victor said that he has been keeping a list of the stories and noting the outcomes; most don’t go to trial. Resa wondered what kind of a mother would do something like this to her daughter. Victor said she was subservient to her husband. There was some discussion about Miss Sutherland’s attractiveness with quotes from Watson by Tom and from Holmes by Resa leading to different views. There was also some discussion about Miss Sutherland’s nearsightedness and how this would effect her typing or, at least, the reading of the shorthand or copy she was typing from—and also the question of being nearsighted (at least now) meaning trouble seeing at a distance, not up close.
 
Elaine wondered what Windibank was doing with all the extra money Miss Sutherland brought into the household and whether he was involved with gambling, drinking, or other women. Vicki said, “Being a short story, not a word was wasted.” She liked the way it moved and the way the story unfolded and thought it was not predictable.
 
Resa read an online article relating to the story entitled “Inspector Baynes and the Impossible,” which led into discussion of how Holmes (standing or sitting) was able to put his feet onto the mantelpiece. Tom suggested it was a misreading of Dr. Watson’s handwriting, and that it should actually have been ottoman or whatever the appropriate word might be. The possibilities of a shorter mantelpiece, that it was actually meant to be a lower portion of the hearth, and that Holmes was practicing yoga were also suggested by members of our group. "Inspector Baynes and the Impossible" may be accessed at http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_108399.asp.
 
There was some discussion of the recent television airing of The Sign of Four and its adherence to the original story (for the most part), and also to the ages of Holmes and Watson onscreen vs. in the stories, with screen versions skewing older.

NEXT MEETING
THE ADVENTURE OF THE SUSSEX VAMPIRE—October 30, 2010, 11 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2010-09-20

0004: A SCANDAL IN BOHEMIA

THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY

DATE
Saturday, August 28, 2010
11:00 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Vicki Clark, Ron Del Ciello, Linda Fredell, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Gayle Lange Puhl, John Richter, Jean Youmans

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

STORY: A SCANDAL IN BOHEMIA
Resa provided the quiz and Victor Rufer, who was unable to attend, nonetheless provided a crossword puzzle related to the story. Gayle answered the most questions correctly, but she abstained from prizes for the very good reason that she had provided them. Ron took first place, with Jean in second, and Elaine and Linda tied for third.

PAPERS AND OTHER READINGS
Gayle recently attended “The Spirits of Sherlock Holmes” conference in Minnesota, and she presented her report on the experience. Resa read her original paper, “Upon the Difference Between Admiration and Love: Some Remarks on Sherlock Holmes and Irene Adler” and also read a poem, “Watson’s Mournful Reveries” by Harlan L. Umansky, which appeared in the February 1997 issue of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine. She read Victor’s notes on Holmes and Adler, as he was not present.

DISCUSSION
Jean said she found Holmes to be sexist and she was mad at him in this story. John asked if all men of the time weren’t sexist. Resa asked what specifically Jean found annoying. Jean said, “He underestimates. What irritates me is his cockiness.” Linda said, “He gave it away with the fire.” Gayle noted that “Conan Doyle was not a man who believed in suffragettes.” Resa noted that he did, however, work for reforms of the divorce laws, which were very unfair to women, and that one of his daughters was a suffragette. There was a discussion of the rights, or lack thereof, for women in the nineteenth century and how women many prostitutes were married women who had been thrown out by their husbands. Gayle pointed out that if a married woman wrote a book, the money went to her husband. Resa said that this was used by Carole Nelson Douglas in her series of books in which Irene Adler was the protagonist, as this had happened to Godfrey Norton’s mother.

Ron said he thought that Holmes’ plan was less than stellar. “Irene Adler’s a pretty smart lady. Who’s gonna fall for a [plumber’s] rocket and red paint?” He said he enjoys the stories, but not necessarily for the plot as much as for the “characterization, the atmosphere.”

Resa said it was interesting how the descriptions of the yellow fog seemed so romantic, but that the fog was yellow because of the high sulfur content. Gayle said she was reading a book called Lost on Planet China, which talked about the pollution problems there (among other things). Elaine, who is from China originally, offered some first-hand observations on this.

John observed that the stories were absolutely straightforward about Holmes’ cocaine use. Resa noted it was not illegal at the time. Gayle said there was a theory that Holmes had been introduced to it by his dentist after his left canine was knocked out in Charing Cross Station.

Vicki said the story was “definitely Holmes.” She liked the ending, which she thought was unexpected. “Sir Arthur Conan Doyle had me until the very end. . . . I’ve seen it before, but reading the story really intensified it.”

Elaine had some thoughts on the story. She said that Holmes had the idea the King would do something worse if he didn't take the case. Irene Adler was warned about Holmes and Adler and Norton already planned to leave, so she had some preparation. The strangers on the street and everything Holmes set up with the weird things happening, one would believe on the spot, but then would wonder (as Adler did). Elaine felt that Adler did research on Holmes when she was warned about him. Since she was an actress herself, she knew all the tricks. “Sherlock can pretend with costume and disguise, but so can she. She is smart.” Unlike the previous two stories, this one mentioned money. Sherlock Holmes had a little arrogance towards the King. Elaine felt the King was “kinder than perceived.” It was not that easy for a King to marry someone at a lower level; he had to deal with the whole country. It would have been easy for someone in his position to have her killed, but he chose to go to Sherlock Holmes instead.

Gayle wondered if this might be the earliest intimation of Moriarty. Did he see her on the dark side because she was an adventuress and warn her about Holmes? (This was a new theory that Gayle thought of on the spot, and a very interesting one.) Resa mentioned that their were two schools of thought on what “the late Irene Adler” meant: either that she was dead at the time Watson records this adventure or that she was no longer Irene Adler because she was now Irene Norton. Resa preferred the second theory but had also read a theory that the King had caught up with Irene at last. If he did so, she added, perhaps he used Moriarty as his “consulting criminal.”

There was some discussion of the new Sherlock Holmes series and the longevity of Holmes. Gayle noted, “Conan Doyle underestimated Holmes as much as Holmes underestimated Irene Adler.”

NEXT MEETING
A CASE OF IDENTITY—September 25, 2010, 11 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2010-08-26

0003: THE SIGN OF FOUR

THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY

DATE
Saturday, July 24, 2010
11:00 a.m.

LOCATION
Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room

MEMBERS PRESENT
Linda Fredell, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Gayle Lange Puhl, John Richter, Victor Rufer

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile

STORY: THE SIGN OF FOUR
Tom Drucker, although not present, sent his quiz, and Gayle provided the swag. Gayle and Resa tied for first place, followed by Linda and Elaine in second and third, respectively.

Gayle read her original paper, “The Jewels of the Agra Treasure or Honestly, Officer, The Box Was Empty When I Opened It.” Resa read “The Sign of Four as a Sign of the Times” by Susan McCloskey, which appeared in the Baker Street Journal of Autumn 2003.

Elaine thought there was a loophole in the story in that Jonathan Small could know so much. It was pointed out that he did have a spy among the servants, but she thought he was on the scene too quickly. Gayle thought he was probably nearby, making money by exhibiting Tonga, and was brought on the scene by a telegram.

Resa noted Holmes’ consideration of Watson and also suggested he has a life beyond Watson, as he must go somewhere to study and practice boxing, etc. Also, he seems able to make friendly acquaintances, as his name has the effect of gaining entry from both Sherman and McMurdo in this story. Gayle said she had a theory that Sherman was a groundskeeper at the Holmes estate when “Mister Sherlock” was growing up.

Victor said that this story shows how important the cases are to Holmes’ well-being; as Holmes says, “I cannot live without brainwork.” There was some discussion about Holmes’ emotional and intellectual life. Gayle thought he had had a disappointing romance in his youth. Elaine pointed out that Buddhist monks live a similarly celibate life, devoting themselves to other things that take the place of romantic concerns.

The meeting closed with a group recital of “221B” by Vincent Starrett.

NEXT MEETING
A SCANDAL IN BOHEMIA—August 28, 2010, 11 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2010-07-23

0002: A STUDY IN SCARLET


DATE
Saturday, June 26, 2010
11:00 a.m.


MEMBERS PRESENT
Ron Del Ciello, Tom Drucker, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer.

CHARTER MEMBER
James Haile.

NEW BUSINESS
Resa noted that our new blog is up. Tom talked about the importance of maintaining a paper presence as well as an electronic presence, submitting some papers to university libraries, etc. There was a discussion of the group putting together some type of publication; Gayle suggested once or twice a year. Everyone agreed this was a good idea. Gayle presented a quiz on A Study in Scarlet and Tom supplied the prizes in the form of books which related in some way to the Holmes stories, including a book about Boswell and the reminiscences of a French detective. Victor presented his paper, First Impressions, detailing how Holmes is viewed through the eyes of Stamford, Watson, and Victor himself.


(This paper is available for view on the blog and on the Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/pages/The-Original-Tree-Worshippers-of-Rock-County/121545477857624?v=app_2347471856&ref=sgm.)


STORY DISCUSSION: A STUDY IN SCARLET
This is the first of the four Holmes novels by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the first Sherlock Holmes story ever, and the story in which the significant first meeting of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson takes place.


Ron brought up the question of whether there could be bruising after death, with which Holmes was experimenting before the story begins (as Stamford explains to Watson). Gayle noted that this was also used in the series Murder Rooms, which features Dr. Joseph Bell and Arthur Conan Doyle as the detectives. Elaine noted that she Googled about Conan Doyle and the Mormons and found that he had apologized for his portrayal of them but that sometimes religious fervor leads to these cult situations, which is close to what is in the story. There was a lively discussion of Mormonism and polygamy, as portrayed in the story and in reality, with input from everyone. Tom pointed out that Sherlock Holmes evolves from his first appearance, when his character is similar to Poe’s Dupin or to Badger from The Wind in the Willows, to a more emotional, full character, that he becomes a different kind of personality. Resa noted that Holmes sort of “wooed” Watson, playing on his curiosity.


NEXT MEETING
The Sign of Four (a.k.a. The Sign of the Four)

Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.

2010-05-25

0001: INAUGURAL MEETING OF THE ORIGINAL TREE WORSHIPPERS OF ROCK COUNTY

DATE
The inaugural meeting of The Original Tree Worshippers of Rock County was held at 10:30 a.m. on May 22, 2010 at the Hedberg Public Library Public Meeting Room in Janesville, Wisconsin.

MEMBERS PRESENT
Ron Del Ciello, Resa Haile, Elaine Khan, Gayle Lange Puhl, Victor Rufer, Katie Wilcox, Kelly Wilcox.

CHARTER MEMBER

James Haile (charter member).

PROCEEDINGS
At our first meeting, members introduced themselves and shared how they first became interested in the Master and some of the experiences they have had since.

Gayle shared some of her adventures with the Sherlockian community. She started reading the Canon at a young age and has known many Sherlockians. Recently, she received an Investiture from the Adventuresses of Sherlock Holmes (ASH): A Glass of Milk, which is a reference to “The Adventure of the Priory School.” Ron spoke of reading Vincent Starrett’s classic work The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes and William S. Baring-Gould’s annotated edition of the stories and how impressed he was at Baring-Gould’s attention to clues in the stories (such as the weather in England on a particular day) in his attempts to date the cases. He also told about meeting a gentleman in full dress (deerstalker and Inverness cape) waving to cars in Florida. Gayle noted there is a healthy Sherlockian community in Florida, including the Pleasant Places of Florida scion. Victor said that he has reread A Study in Scarlet twice within the last few days and is amazed by how many tangents he can get off on from that story and things that relate to the other stories and back again. Elaine discovered Holmes in translation when she was a teacher in China. Her favorite story is “The Adventure of the Speckled Band,” which was included in the textbooks. Resa shared her experience of getting hooked on Holmes in elementary school and moving back and forth between Doyle and pastiches. Kelly and Katie are just starting out. Kelly said she thought the first Sherlockian thing she’d seen was The Great Mouse Detective, which many agreed was a fine film. Katie particularly liked the recent movie with Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law.

However we started out, we all came together to begin our new group and share our interest.

DISCUSSION OF FUTURE MEETINGS

There was discussion about how often the group should meet, what time, day of week, and what the focus should be. The name of The Original Tree Worshippers of Rock County was officially voted in, and future meetings will be once a month, initially, on a Saturday at 11 a.m.

A Study in Scarlet was selected as the first story to be discussed. Ron once wrote a paper about Holmes and Watson for a psychology class and will try to find it for the next meeting. Victor plans to write a short paper. Gayle will make up a quiz. Resa will check on aortic aneurysms.

Gayle played a short video interview with Adrian Conan Doyle. The group ended by taking photos to memorialize the first meeting and had cake in honor of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s 151st birthday.


Minutes prepared by Resa Haile.